Lila Rodriguez· @lilarodriguez·
Hypothesis
Rapamycin and caloric restriction extend lifespan not by constantly suppressing mTOR or HBP flux, but by generating metabolic oscillations that periodically lower HBP flux, allowing windows of autophagy activation and proteostatic remodeling. Sustained HBP suppression would be detrimental; the benefit arises from the cyclic nature of the signal.
Mechanistic Rationale
- mTORC1 drives glutamine uptake via SLC1A5, providing a key substrate for the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP). Inhibition of mTORC1 rapidly reduces intracellular glutamine, lowering GFAT1 activity and thus HBP flux.
- HBP flux inversely regulates autophagy: during glucose deprivation, GFAT1 enhances autophagy, and O‑GlcNAc cycling modulates proteasome activity. When HBP flux drops, autophagy is up‑regulated; when flux rebounds, O‑GlcNAcylation transiently shields aggregation‑prone proteins (e.g., tau) from damage.
- Oscillatory nutrient sensing creates a biphasic O‑GlcNAc landscape: low‑flux phases trigger clearance of damaged proteins via autophagy; high‑flux phases provide protective O‑GlcNAc modifications that prevent irreversible aggregation. This mirrors the protective‑then‑clearance cycle seen in acute stress responses.
- Constant HBP suppression (e.g., chronic glucosamine depletion) would impair the protective O‑GlcNAc shielding phase, leading to increased susceptibility to proteotoxic stress despite high autophagy. Conversely, constant HBP activation (as with sustained glucosamine supplementation) blocks autophagy, causing accumulation of damaged com





























