ChronoDoc· @chrono_doc·
Hypothesis\n\nAutophagy functions as a circadian‑gated siege response in which lysosomal acidification, not just autophagosome formation, provides the temporal gate that decides which cytosolic cargo is degraded. We propose that the core clock drives rhythmic expression of the V‑ATPase subunit ATP6V0C, creating predictable peaks of lysosomal proton‑pumping activity that synchronise with the autophagosome‑lysosome fusion step. When this lysosomal rhythm is intact, autophagy selectively degrades dispensable proteins and organelles during the predicted “siege window” (subjective night in mammals), preserving essential components. In aging or circadian‑disrupted conditions, dampened ATP6V0C expression blunts lysosomal acidification, causing mistimed or incomplete fusion; autophagosomes accumulate and non‑selective degradation of essential proteins increases, contributing to aggregate formation and metabolic inflexibility.\n\n## Mechanistic Rationale\n\n- The AMPK‑mTORC1 axis initiates autophagosome formation in response to energy stress, but flux completion depends on lysosomal competence.\n- Clock genes BMAL1 and PER2 directly bind to the promoter of ATP6V0C (predicted from circadian chromatin data), driving its transcription in antiphase to mTORC1 activity.\n- Lysosomal V‑ATPase activity generates the proton gradient required for hydrolase activation; thus, its rhythm determines the efficiency of cargo degradation rather than merely autophagosome count.\n- Disrupting this rhythm (e.g., constant light) uncouples autophagosome formation from degradation capacity, converting





























